<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All Night Diner &#187; statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://micropipes.com/blog/tag/statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://micropipes.com/blog</link>
	<description>because at 3am anything sounds good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:34:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Continuous Integration comes to AMO</title>
		<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/07/continuous-integration-comes-to-amo/</link>
		<comments>http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/07/continuous-integration-comes-to-amo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wil Clouser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micropipes.com/blog/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s time to hail another milestone for AMO in our epic push for improvements in 2010.  This time I&#8217;m happy to announce our Hudson continuous integration server which has been humming along for a few months.

Hudson Integration Screenshot.  Click to enlarge.
AMO is the first Mozilla Webdev site to use continuous integration, and it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time to hail another milestone for <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/">AMO</a> in our <a href="http://micropipes.com/blog/2009/11/17/amo-development-changes-in-2010/">epic push for improvements in 2010</a>.  This time I&#8217;m happy to announce our <a href="https://hudson.mozilla.org/job/preview.addons.mozilla.org/">Hudson continuous integration server</a> which has been humming along for a few months.</p>
<p><a href="http://micropipes.com/blog/wp-content/img/hudson_screenshot.png"><img src="http://micropipes.com/blog/wp-content/img/hudson_screenshot_small.png" title="Hudson Summary Screenshot" style="border:1px solid #000; padding:10px;" /></a></p>
<caption>Hudson Integration Screenshot.  Click to enlarge.</caption>
<p>AMO is the first Mozilla Webdev site to use continuous integration, and it&#8217;s been a long time coming.  With the way it&#8217;s currently configured we&#8217;ve got <a href="https://hudson.mozilla.org/job/preview.addons.mozilla.org/512/cobertura/?">code coverage trending</a>, <a href="https://hudson.mozilla.org/job/preview.addons.mozilla.org/512/testReport/?">unit test trending</a>, <a href="https://hudson.mozilla.org/job/preview.addons.mozilla.org/512/violations/?">code quality trending</a>, as well as detailed reports for all the above for every single check in.</p>
<p>If anything fails or oversteps a threshold our IRC bot complains and we can get it fixed up quickly.  It&#8217;s a boon to productivity to know that all the code being checked in is being tested automatically, plus it gives everyone a stable state to compare to.</p>
<p>Thanks to everyone that helped get Hudson going, from the <a href="http://blog.hudson-ci.org/">people that write it</a>, to <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/it/">the IT team that keeps it alive</a>, to <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/">the webdev team</a> that helped work out the kinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/07/continuous-integration-comes-to-amo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 50 searches on addons.mozilla.org</title>
		<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2009/05/26/top-50-searches-on-addonsmozillaorg/</link>
		<comments>http://micropipes.com/blog/2009/05/26/top-50-searches-on-addonsmozillaorg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wil Clouser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[add-ons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micropipes.com/blog/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The flight from Portland to San Jose is just about the right length to write some scripts to analyze a bunch of data, make a pretty graph, and then write a blog post drawing fairly obvious conclusions.  Someone on IRC said they were interested in the top search terms being used on addons.mozilla.org so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flight from Portland to San Jose is just about the right length to write some scripts to analyze a bunch of data, make a pretty graph, and then write a blog post drawing fairly obvious conclusions.  Someone on <abbr title="Internet Relay Chat">IRC</abbr> said they were interested in the top search terms being used on <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/">addons.mozilla.org</a> so here we are.</p>
<p>During the week of April 29, 2009 and May 5, 2009 there were around 150000 queries.  Of the top 20 queries on addons.mozilla.org (a quick estimate says that is around 12% of the total queries on the site) only 7 actually have search terms.  The rest are just choosing different options for the search like category or number of results on a page.  If we filter the top queries for ones that include search terms we get a graph that looks like this:</p>
<p><img src="/blog/wp-content/img/amo.searches.graph.05.2009.png" title="Top 50 search terms and their rankings on addons.mozilla.org" /></p>
<p>All the searches on that page are for the <abbr title="English (US)">en-US</abbr> locale unless otherwise noted.  It looks like the majority of searches are for specific add-ons but there are also some popular generic terms like <em>download</em>, <em>gmail</em>, and <em>video</em>.  I think it&#8217;s interesting that German was the only other locale to make the list (and fairly high up on the list).  Maybe the next stats post will be about overall locale use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://micropipes.com/blog/2009/05/26/top-50-searches-on-addonsmozillaorg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
