<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All Night Diner &#187; Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://micropipes.com/blog/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://micropipes.com/blog</link>
	<description>because at 3am anything sounds good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:34:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Another warning option for submitting forms?</title>
		<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2008/04/04/another-warning-option-for-submitting-forms/</link>
		<comments>http://micropipes.com/blog/2008/04/04/another-warning-option-for-submitting-forms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 04:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wil Clouser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micropipes.com/blog/2008/04/04/another-warning-option-for-submitting-forms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are our current options for submitting forms in Firefox 3:

I don&#8217;t know anyone that has the &#8220;I submit information that&#8217;s not encrypted&#8221; option checked.  We used to prompt for submitting information that was unencrypted, next we added an option on the dialog that disabled the warning (and was checked by default), and finally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are our current options for submitting forms in Firefox 3:<br />
<img src="/blog/wp-content/img/firefox_security_options.png" alt="Firefox security options dialog" /></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know anyone that has the &#8220;I submit information that&#8217;s not encrypted&#8221; option checked.  We used to prompt for submitting information that was unencrypted, next we added an option on the dialog that disabled the warning (and was checked by default), and finally we removed the warning by default all together.  People submit so much information via searches, surveys, voting, sending quick messages, etc. that it would just get in the way and be ignored.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed lately that <a href="http://www.wachovia.com/">a</a> <a href="http://www.scottrade.com/">lot</a> <a href="http://geico.com">of</a> <a href="http://www.tdameritrade.com">sites</a> are showing login forms on unencrypted pages but submitting them via <abbr title="Secure Socket Layer">SSL</abbr> to their target pages.  This is a secure method of logging in but it&#8217;s started to train me to not look for a secure connection before I log in and that&#8217;s not a good idea in the long run.</p>
<p>I think our current option is too broad, so I&#8217;m proposing that we add an option that says &#8220;I submit credentials that aren&#8217;t encrypted&#8221; or a sub-option for the current text that says something about &#8220;unless I&#8217;m sending a password.&#8221;</p>
<p>In more technical language:  If a user POSTs a form containing an input of type=&#8221;password&#8221; to a non-encrypted page we should show a warning.</p>
<p>This would mean regular searches, filling in surveys, anonymous voting and polls would all pass transparently if unencrypted, but when you got to a form with a password you would be warned.</p>
<p>I bounced this idea off a channel in <abbr title="Internet Relay Chat">IRC</abbr> and no one said I was nuts so I figured I&#8217;d take it here.  It seems like too small of a feature to make an add-on out of but I might if I get some free time.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://micropipes.com/blog/2008/04/04/another-warning-option-for-submitting-forms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curious about how your add-on will get along with Firefox 3?</title>
		<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2008/02/06/curious-about-how-your-add-on-will-get-along-with-firefox-3/</link>
		<comments>http://micropipes.com/blog/2008/02/06/curious-about-how-your-add-on-will-get-along-with-firefox-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wil Clouser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[add-ons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micropipes.com/blog/2008/02/06/curious-about-how-your-add-on-will-get-along-with-firefox-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox 3 is coming down the pipeline along with a pile of great new features like caching web apps so they are available offline and the new Places API that provides a powerful interface to your bookmarks and history.  No need to fret if your extensions will be compatible though &#8211; here&#8217;s the lowdown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3 is coming down the pipeline along with a pile of great new features like <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Online_and_offline_events">caching web apps so they are available offline</a> and <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Places">the new Places API</a> that provides a powerful interface to your bookmarks and history.  No need to fret if your extensions will be compatible though &#8211; here&#8217;s the lowdown on what it takes to stay up to date:</p>
<p>Want to know the big changes and what&#8217;s brand new in Firefox 3?  Check out <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Firefox_3_for_developers">Firefox 3 for developers</a>.</p>
<p>Want to get right to the part about updating your extensions for Firefox 3?  We&#8217;ve got <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Updating_extensions_for_Firefox_3">a wiki page for that too</a>.</p>
<p>If you know your extension will work and you just want to know what you need to do on <abbr title="addons.mozilla.org">AMO</abbr> check out <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/blog/4">Justin&#8217;s quick review</a>.</p>
<p>For more personalized assistance feel free to ask your question in <a href="irc://irc.mozilla.org/extdev">#extdev</a> on <a href="http://irc.mozilla.org">irc.mozilla.org</a>.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ll be in Brussels, Belgium at the end of this month (February 23rd and 24th) you should consider hitting up Mozilla&#8217;s <a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/Fosdem:2008:Workshop">Extension Developer&#8217;s Workshop</a> at <a href="http://fosdem.org/2008/"><abbr title="Free and Open Source Software Developers' European Meeting">FOSDEM</abbr> 2008</a>.  It promises a trifecta of awesomeness including <a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/Fosdem:2008:Attendees">helpful people</a>, <a href="http://store.mozilla.org/">Mozilla swag</a>, and <a href="http://fosdem.org/2008/beerevent">delicious beer</a>.</p>
<p><em>Edit: update first link to be more useful</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://micropipes.com/blog/2008/02/06/curious-about-how-your-add-on-will-get-along-with-firefox-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
