<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMO brings new levels of pedantry to Mozilla Webdev</title>
	<atom:link href="http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/14/amo-brings-new-levels-of-pedantry-to-mozilla-webdev/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/14/amo-brings-new-levels-of-pedantry-to-mozilla-webdev/</link>
	<description>because at 3am anything sounds good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:52:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Clouser</title>
		<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/14/amo-brings-new-levels-of-pedantry-to-mozilla-webdev/comment-page-1/#comment-59981</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Clouser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micropipes.com/blog/?p=148#comment-59981</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thanks Wil. We also use pylint with the violations plug-in, but I was hoping that I can maybe configure this check script separately. The pylint output is still a bit too much, and it would be useful to have this separately.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The things it will report on are about the same as pylint, but since Hudson just uses shell scripts you could have it run and if there is output email it to the committer.  The output isn&#039;t in the standard violations format so you can&#039;t just plug it in to that.  We use it more as a &quot;run before commit&quot; and &quot;run when code reviewing&quot; tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thanks Wil. We also use pylint with the violations plug-in, but I was hoping that I can maybe configure this check script separately. The pylint output is still a bit too much, and it would be useful to have this separately.</p></blockquote>
<p>The things it will report on are about the same as pylint, but since Hudson just uses shell scripts you could have it run and if there is output email it to the committer.  The output isn&#8217;t in the standard violations format so you can&#8217;t just plug it in to that.  We use it more as a &#8220;run before commit&#8221; and &#8220;run when code reviewing&#8221; tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F Wolff</title>
		<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/14/amo-brings-new-levels-of-pedantry-to-mozilla-webdev/comment-page-1/#comment-59971</link>
		<dc:creator>F Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micropipes.com/blog/?p=148#comment-59971</guid>
		<description>Thanks Wil. We also use pylint with the violations plug-in, but I was hoping that I can maybe configure this check script separately.  The pylint output is still a bit too much, and it would be useful to have this separately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Wil. We also use pylint with the violations plug-in, but I was hoping that I can maybe configure this check script separately.  The pylint output is still a bit too much, and it would be useful to have this separately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Clouser</title>
		<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/14/amo-brings-new-levels-of-pedantry-to-mozilla-webdev/comment-page-1/#comment-59949</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Clouser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micropipes.com/blog/?p=148#comment-59949</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hi Wil. Were you able to integrate Jeff Balogh’s check script with Hudson?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not his script, but we&#039;re using the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Violations&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Violations plug-in&lt;/a&gt; with the output of PyLint which gives us close to the same thing.  The script to run it is &lt;a href=&quot;http://github.com/jbalogh/zamboni/blob/master/scripts/pylint.sh&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and here is an &lt;a href=&quot;https://hudson.mozilla.org/job/preview.addons.mozilla.org/violations/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;example report&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hi Wil. Were you able to integrate Jeff Balogh’s check script with Hudson?</p></blockquote>
<p>Not his script, but we&#8217;re using the <a href="http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Violations" rel="nofollow">Violations plug-in</a> with the output of PyLint which gives us close to the same thing.  The script to run it is <a href="http://github.com/jbalogh/zamboni/blob/master/scripts/pylint.sh" rel="nofollow">here</a> and here is an <a href="https://hudson.mozilla.org/job/preview.addons.mozilla.org/violations/" rel="nofollow">example report</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F Wolff</title>
		<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/14/amo-brings-new-levels-of-pedantry-to-mozilla-webdev/comment-page-1/#comment-59945</link>
		<dc:creator>F Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micropipes.com/blog/?p=148#comment-59945</guid>
		<description>Hi Wil. Were you able to integrate Jeff Balogh&#039;s check script with Hudson?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wil. Were you able to integrate Jeff Balogh&#8217;s check script with Hudson?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://micropipes.com/blog/2010/04/14/amo-brings-new-levels-of-pedantry-to-mozilla-webdev/comment-page-1/#comment-59928</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micropipes.com/blog/?p=148#comment-59928</guid>
		<description>Best part of the post is where you called the vim screenshot &quot;IDE Screenshot&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best part of the post is where you called the vim screenshot &#8220;IDE Screenshot&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

